2021 Spring
$0.00
Archived
How to Talk About Climate Change
and Keep Your Friends
Instructor: Chuck Acker
Thursdays • 8 classes – 3/18-5/6 • 9:00 AM
Class size 5-24 students
7 seats remaining
Location: Zoom
How to Talk About Climate Change and Keep Your Friends will address the ideological divide in this country, particularly regarding climate change, and more generally, political issues. We will utilize the insights of cognitive psychology to understand how we develop and maintain our belief structures or World View (Weltanschaung) and why it is difficult to change what we believe. The class also offers some suggestions on how to respond to climate change skepticism or denial when we encounter it. We are encouraged to look at ourselves and recognize our own biases. Some of the ideas presented will seem counter-intuitive and will require considerable work to appreciate their effectiveness. Hopefully, by delving into these psychological and social processes, our course will help us to more empathetically deal with the position of the “other guy.”
It is essential that you use a particular book about cognitive processes which affect our beliefs about climate change. A major part of our discussion in class will be based upon this book by Per Esper Stoknes, Norwegian cognitive psychologist, entitled What We Think About When We Try Not To Think About Global Warming.” You will find this book easy reading, highly informative, sometimes amusing and hopefully mind-changing.
Textbook: In lieu of tuition, students are asked to purchase their textbook. Students should order it as soon as possible after registering for the course.
The textbook, What We Think About When We Try Not to Think About Global Warming:Toward a New Psychology of Climate Action by Per Espen Stoknes, April 2015, may be obtained directly from:
• Chelsea Green Publishing, 85 North Main St., Suite 120, White River Junction, VT 05001; 802-295-6300 or
• The ISBN Search link. Contact the UMASC office if you need help.
Syllabus: Students will use the syllabus (below) which describes basic principles of cognitive psychology as it applies to controversial subjects and a rich store of opinions, viewpoints and understandings pertinent to the nation’s ideological divisions. This syllabus is your guide to the course. Please refer to it and make full use of it.
SYLLABUS: Course Guide by Week
DESIGN OF CLASS
The first part of each class, which comes before the class break, is intended to cover the concepts gleaned from the readings in Stoknes; the second part, coming after the break, is intended to present related ideas from a broader reading of other authors, and a theory about the formation of morality-toned belief systems in PowerPoint presentations.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
PART ONE:
Expectations
(1) Of Students: To read the assignment as indicated in this Syllabus (about 35 pages per week) prior to the class meeting, and make note of any questions or comments you would like to offer in group discussion.
(2) Of Instructor: To lead the class in discussion of ideas prompted by the reading. Sample discussion questions and ideas are provided.
A. Objectives of course
- To learn some basic processes which govern deep-seated beliefs and how a personal World View is formed. (World View is an assembly of feelings, attitudes, beliefs and morality assumptions which inform and influence our social, religious and political behavior.)
- To be able to describe and give examples of:
a. Confirmation bias
b. Cognitive dissonance
c. Influence of group identification
d. The silo effect - To understand the significance of “fast” and “slow” thinking.
- To learn better about how to listen and to employ some strategies such as “reframing” and “nudges” to keep the conversation going.
- To be able, in a conversation with an opponent, to give an empathetic representation of your opposite’s point of view.
- To know some community-based actions that are appropriate for dealing with climate change.
- To understand significant aspects of climate anxiety and depression and some strategies for dealing with mental health consequences of this crisis.
- To appreciate that there is no certain objective reality or absolute truth, that different societies or social groups establish their own processes for establishing what is (tentatively?) true.
- To recognize the motivations and actions of some political groups which oppose climate change amelioration.
PART TWO:
Understanding What We Are Talking About
A. References
- Figueres and Rivett-Carnac: The Future We Choose: Surviving the Climate Crisis
“We are still just barely inside a zone where we can stove off the worst and manage the remaining long term effects. But only if we do what is required of us in the short term.”
- The House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis: Solving the Climate Crisis
From the Executive Summary: “With the health and economic consequences of climate change growing at home and abroad, and in concert with the international community to provide a livable climate for today’s youth and future generations” …this report is presented…
- Introduction of Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory which identifies the emotional basis for our political and religious beliefs (PowerPoint).
MENTAL PROCESSES OF SKEPTICS REACTING TO
SCIENTIFIC ASSERTIONS ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE
PART ONE:
A. Assigned Reading: Stoknes pp. xiii- 34
B. Suggested Discussion – Questions
- What is the climate paradox?
- What is the usual reaction when a climate change skeptic is confronted by scientific facts?
- How do each of these genetically developed forces influence our reactions to climate change?
a. Self interest
b. Status
c. Imitation
d. Short termism
e. Risk avoidance
PART TWO:
The Moral Basis for Our World Views
A. Reference: Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. Moral Foundation Theory:
- Group-oriented genetic predispositions developed through the need for human survival:
a. Care versus harm avoidance
b. Fairness versus cheating
c. Loyalty versus betrayal
d. Authority versus subversion
e. Sanctity (protection of sacred symbols) versus degradation
f. Freedom versus institutional controlThese are inborn tendencies concerning feelings of right and wrong which serve to solidify the group.
- The earliest influences are family/small group teaching
a. Conservative families tend to emphasize authority, loyalty, sanctity (cleanliness, sacredness), fairness (just deserts)
b. Liberal families tend to emphasize care and fairness (equality, justice) - Article: Adam Frank: “…Experiments show that preaching and prosecutions usually backfire, and what doesn’t sway people may strengthen their beliefs.” NYT Opinion, 1/3/21
(Publication sources are shown in the Bibliography at the end of this syllabus.)
PERCEPTION, SOCIAL INFLUENCE, AND BELIEF
PART ONE:
Perception, Social Influence, and Belief
A. Assigned Reading: Stoknes pp. 35-69
B. Suggested Discussion – Questions
- Describe the concepts of “salience” and “distance” as they pertain to perception and readiness to believe.
- How does perception of risk play into the attitude toward climate change?
- Describe the various categories of people in terms of their concern about climate change.
PART TWO:
Social Influences: The Power of Group Identification
A. References:
- Haidt: How do we know what to believe? The significance of group (social class) membership and identification in forming beliefs.
- Articles:
a. Jonathan Rauch: “The Constitution of Knowledge”
“What is objective reality? “…humans have no direct access to an objective reality independent of our minds and senses, and subjective certainty is in no way a guarantee of truth…philosophers have a pretty good working definition of objective reality. It is a set of propositions that have been validated in some way…a critical mass needs to agree on what it is we do that distinguishes truth from falsehood, and more important who does it (by rules). The community that follows these rules is by no means limited to scholars and scientists. It also includes journalism, the courts, law enforcement and the intelligence community—all evidence-based professions that require competing hypotheses to be tested and justified.” National Affairs, Fall 2018
Instructor’s note: Rauch’s model prevails in WEIRD (western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic) societies. Other societies or cultures may utilize [sometimes exclusively] other means [e.g. tradition, religious teachings, widespread anger, conspiracy theories, charisma of a leader, passion or intensity for a dissident belief] as the exclusive basis for “truth.”
OVERCOMING THE BARRIERS TO
CLIMATE CHANGE ACCEPTANCE
PART ONE:
Devices to Protect Our World View
A. Assigned Reading: Stoknes pp. 70-109
B. Suggested Discussion – Questions
- What are some of the personal issues that have given climate denial powerful impetus?
- What are some of the strategies which can be used to overcome barriers to climate change acceptance and action?
PART TWO:
Social Class Conflict
A. References:
Book: Currid-Halkett: The Sum of All things; A Theory of the Aspirational Class
“The Leisure Class” described by Veblen has been replaced by a new elite whose members care about discreet consumption. They tend to be technically or professionally trained, depend upon access to rarified information, cultivate their children’s growth and education, practice yoga, eat organic food, reproduce wealth and upward mobility, invest for retirement, and build upon cultural capital. They deepen the cultural divide.
- Articles:
a. Edsall: “The resentment that never sleeps”“ Status has always been part of American politics, but right now a variety of social changes have threatened the status of working class and rural whites who used to feel they had a secure, middle class status position in American society….The reduction of working-class wages and job security, growing demographic diversity, and increasing urbanization of the population have greatly undercut that sense and fueled political reaction.” (Cecelia Ridgeway, Stanford U.), NYT Opinion Page 12/9/20
b: Eli J.Finkel, et al; “Political Sectarianism in the United States”
“A poisonous cocktail of othering, aversion and moralization poses a threat to democracy… First… The parties have sorted along racial, religious, educational and geographical lines… Second, as Americans have grown more receptive to consuming information slanted through a partisan lens, the media ecosystem has inflamed political sectarianism… Third, in contrast to the equivocal ideological-polarization trends among the public, politicians and other political elites have unambiguously polarized recently on ideological ground.” Science; Policy Forum; Social Science, October 30, 2020
c. David Brooks, “Who is Driving Inequality? You are”
“Inherited inequality is bad enough. But it’s the geographic concentration that is really turning America into a caste society: Affluent people used to be spread around… Now those of us in the top 20 percent of earners are concentrated in talent-rich zones…The already advantaged build rich communities and multiply another one’s advantage even more. It takes a village to raise a Stanford grad.” NYT Opinion Page 4/23/20
FORMULATING THE ARGUMENT, STRATEGIZING THE APPROACH
PART ONE:
A. Assigned Reading: Stoknes pp. 110-131
B. Suggested Discussion – Questions
- What is meant by “re-framing?” Give significant examples.
- What are “nudges” which can be implemented to make opposing climate change denial worthwhile?
PART TWO:
Two Modes of Thinking
A. References:
Books:
a. Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow
“My main aim here is to present a view of how the mind works that draws on recent developments in cognitive and social psychology….We now understand the marvelous as well as the flaws of intuitive thought.”.b. Thaler and Sunstein: Improving Decision Making Through Nudges
“If incentives and nudges replace requirements and bans, government will be both smaller and more modest. So to be clear: we are not for bigger government, just for better governance.”- Articles:
a. Greg Weiner, “How do We Get to Herd Immunity for Fake News?
“In a free society, the best response to viral misinformation is to fortify our immune system against it, informationally speaking, by developing citizens who are motivated and able to distinguish truth from fiction. Perhaps more important, these citizens must be able to deal with the nuance in between.” NYT Opinion 12/14/20b. Alan D. Solomont, “Our Democracy Demands Civic Education”
“Our expectations for what students should learn have been set far too low. It is one thing to teach that there are three branches of Government and what each one does. It is more ambitious to expect every young American to know how to select good information, to reason with people who may disagree about complex problems, to influence a range of institutions effectively—and to uphold the core values of our republic.”
Instructor’s Note: Critique of teaching critical thinking as a strategy: The importance of teaching critical thinking, as well as history and civics for the envelopment of citizenship is certain; but such programs have to be long-term and must overcome confirmation bias, cognitive dissonance and group influence.
SCALING THE WALLS OF THE DENIAL PSYCHE
PART ONE:
Signs of Acceptance?
A. Assigned Reading: Stoknes pp. 132-162
B. Suggested Discussion – Questions
What can you add to the stories we tell which can enliven “save the planet thinking?”
What are some of the signs of progress in dealing with climate change?
PART TWO:
Let’s Be Strategic
A. References:
Articles:
a. Adam Grant, “The Science of Reasoning with Unreasonable People”
“Don’t try to change someone’s mind. Instead, help them find their own motivation to change… You do that by interviewing them—asking open-ended questions and listening carefully—holding up a mirror so they can see their own thoughts more clearly.” NYT Opinion 1/31/21b. Anne Applebaum, “Coexistence Is the Only Option“
“…the seditionists have indeed declared their independence from the rest of us. January 6 was indeed to a different rule book. And yet they cannot be wished away, or sent away, or somehow locked up. They will not leave of their own accord, and Americans who accept Biden’s lawful victory won’t either. We have no choice except to coexist…. Here’s another idea: drop the argument and change the subject.” Examples given of successful coexistence, including Northern Ireland. The Atlantic Ideas 1/20/21c. Thomas b. Edsall, “The QAnon Delusion Has Not Loosened its Grip”
“… in a 12/30/20 NPR/Ipsos Poll : 17 % of Americans believe in the myth about the child sex ring; a third believe voter fraud helped Biden win the presidential election, 39% agree that there is a deep state working to undermine President Trump. “Conspiracy theorists are more likely to believe the world is a dangerous place full of bad people”… “more likely to share false information, more accepting of political violence. Conspiracy theories raise the temperature of polarization and make it more difficult for people from ideological camps to have data-based discussions about political matters, even those that are in critical need of immediate attention.”
DEALING WITH CLIMATE DESPAIR
PART ONE:
Employing the Imagination
A. Assigned Reading: Stoknes pp. 161-201
The emerging climate change pandemic will impose upon us and our progeny immense new stresses. What are some of the mental techniques the author suggests for standing up to depression and other issues?
What does the author mean by “opening to the world?”
PART TWO:
Meeting our Emotional Problems Head-On
A. References:
- Book: Davenport: Emotional Resiliency in the Era of Climate Change: A Clinician’s Guide.
Article: Max Goodman: “Why We Need Climate Stoicism to Overcome Climate Despair;”
“Climate despair is just the natural result of two increasingly pervasive ideas: first, if society doesn’t decarbonize in the next 30 years, we’ll be staring down the barrel of a global environmental cataclism; and second, there’s no way we’re going to decarbonize in time. Neither idea is entirely wrong, but both are drastically overly simplified, and when carelessly combined, they demotivate in a moment when we desperately need motivation… Our last and best hope is to invite nuance back into our rhetoric… A good Stoic journeys into darkness and emerges able to cope with the real world,.” State of the Planet, Earth Institute, Columbia University, May 19, 2020
FINDING HOPE IN THE AIR WE BREATHE
AND IN INTERNAL COMMITMENT
PART ONE:
Techniques
A. Assigned Reading: Stoknes pp. 202-227
Suggested Discussion – Questions
a. What is the value if any, of imaging our surround of living air? How can this metaphor be of help?
b. What do you make out of the (Zen?) paradox, “It’s hopeless and I’ll give it my all?”
PART TWO:
Recognizing and Dealing with
Climate Anxiety, Acceptance and Engagement
A. References:
Articles:
a. Daniel Dodgen, Mental Health and Well-Being
“The mental health and well-being consequences of extreme events, particularly natural disasters, are common and form a significant part of the overall effects on health. These consequences of climate-change related impacts rarely occur in isolation, but often interact with other social and environmental stressors.” U.S Dept. of Human Services, The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States – A Scientific Assessment, 2016b. Tina Donvito, “Climate Change and Mental Health:”
“Dealing with Climate Despair” “I have to accept my discomfort that the future is unknown, while knowing that there are things that I can do to help make a difference.” My Healthy Newsetter 12/04/20c. Eve Andrews, “Climate Anxiety Doesn’t Have To Ruin Your Life; Here’s How to Manage It”
“Confront the end of your own life, then figure out one thing you can do to channel your anxiety effectively.” One person creates beautiful sculpture of corals. Another works on a food sovereignty project. Another organizes her community and gets involved in politics. Grist – The Weekly Sept. 5, 2017
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS:
- Currid-Halkett, Elizabeth, The Sum of Small Things: A Theory of the Aspirational Class, Princeton, Princeton University Press 2017, ISBN search
- Davenport, Leslie, Emotional Resliency in the Era of Climate Change: A Clinician’s Guide, [pb: Out of print, Kindle available from Amazon], ISBN search
- Figueres, Christiana and Rivett-Carnac, Tom, The Future We Choose: Surviving the Climate Crisis, New York, Knopf 2020, ISBN search
- Haidt, Jonathan, The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, New York, Vintage (Random House) 2012, ISBN search
- Stoknes, Per Espen, What We Think About When We Try Not to Think about Global Warming: Toward a New Psychology of Climate Action, Chelsea Green Publishing, 85 North Main St., Ste.120, Tel. 802-295- 6300, 120 White River Junction, Vermont 05001 2015, ISBN search
- Thaler, Richard H. and Sunstein, Cass R., Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness, New York, Penguin Books, 2008, ISBN search
PERIODICALS:
- Andrews, Eve, “Climate Anxiety Doesn’t Have to Ruin Your Life. Here’s How to Manage It. Grist Weekly, Sep.t. 5, 2017
- Applebaum, Anne, “Coexistence is the Only Option.” The Atlantic Jan. 20, 2021
- Brooks, David, “Who Is Driving Inequality? You Are.” New York Times Opinion Page Apr. 23, 2020
- Brooks, David, “The Rotting of the Republican Mind” New York Times Opinion Page Nov. 26, 2020
- Brooks, David, “Letter to a Young Republican” New York Times Opinion Page Feb. 18, 2021
- Donvito, Tina, “Dealing With Climate Despair: Climate Change and Mental Health, My Healthy Newsletter Dec.4, 2020
- Edsall, Thomaqs B., “The Resentment That Never Sleeps.” New York Times Opinion Page, Dec. 9, 2020
- Edsall, Thomas B., “America, We Have a Problem.” New York Times Opinion Page, Dec. 16, 2020
- Edsall, Tomas B., “The QAnon Delusion Has not Loosened Its’ Grip.” New York Times Opinion Page, Feb 20, 2021
- Finkel, Elie, et al, “Political Sectarianism in America” Science, Policy Forum, Social Science, Oct. 30, 2020
- Friedman, Thomas L., “Cyberspace Plus Donald Trump Almost Killed Our Democracy. Can Europe Save Us?” New York Times Opinion Page, Feb. 9, 2021
- Goodman, Max, “Why We Need Climate Stoicism to Overcome Climate Despair” State of the Planet: Earth Institute/Columbia University, May 19, 2020
- Grant, Adam, “The Science of Reasoning With Unreasonable People” New York Times Opinion Page, Jan. 31, 2021
- Larsen, Patricia, “A Majority of People Arrested for Capitol Riot Had a History of Financial Trouble” Quora: Bring Back Democracy, Feb. 11, 2021
- Rauch, Jonathan, “The Constitution of Knowledge” National Affairs, Fall 2018
- Solomont, Alan D., “Our Democracy Demands Civic Education” Kennebec Journal Opinion Page, Jan. 29, 2021

Charles Acker holds a PhD in clinical and physiological psychology from UCLA to help him understand belief systems and mind-body relationships. In the distant past he worked with community leaders, interested older citizens, Senior College Network promoters and key UMA personnel to help bring Senior College to Augusta.